GMAT精選范文第78則

　　The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business newsmagazine.

　　Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

　　Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

　　In this editorial, the author argues that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer, in support of this claim the author reasons that since wages paid to employees should increase as the risk of physical injury increases, the converse should be true as well. Hence, by decreasing the risk of injury, employers could decrease the wages paid to workers and thereby save money. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons.

　　To begin with the author assumes that because companies would agree that as risk of injury increases wages should also increase, they would also agree that as risk decreases wages should also decrease accordingly. This is tantamount to the assumption that risk of injury is the primary factor that determines workers wages. It is obvious that few employers, and even fewer employees, would agree that this is the case. To adopt this position one would have to disregard education, experience, and skill as equally important factors in determining the wages paid to workers.

【GMAT第】相關(guān)文章：

GMAT備考范文08-07

GMAT考試范文08-01

GMAT考試記08-01

GMAT考試說明08-02

GMAT黃金范文08-05

GMAT作文：Uniforms08-07

GMAT的考試秘訣07-30

GMAT考試的要素07-30

GMAT考試詳解06-22

GMAT考試介紹06-22